Plagiarism In the Book of Mormon
Mormonism Exposed
What about Plagiarism in the Book of Mormon?
Some churches raise money with rummage and bake sales. One group auctioned countless quilts from a very large rented auditorium. Still others follow the example of the first Christians, and “pass the plate” each Sunday (1 Cor. 16:2). Early Mormons, on the other hand, used an unprecedented technique: they raised money by stealing. Consider 3 points:
Point 1: The 1934 book, Holy Murder: The Story of Porter Rockwell says “…Joseph the Prophet … encouraged …robbing…hen roosts….stealing… cattle and horses [and] pillaging… lonely homesteads.” The prophet set a profound precedent for pilfering: he plagiarized 25,000 Book of Mormon words from the Bible’s King James Version. “Plagiarizing” is defined as: “… literary theft”… [presenting] as new and original…material…derived from an existing source.” Lengthy sections were cut from the whole cloth of God’s intellectual property and brazenly sewn into the Book of Mormon. Consider Isaiah 4:1-3:
And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, we will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach. In that day shall the branch of the Lord be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and comely for them that are escaped of Israel. And it shall come to pass, that he that is left in Zion, and he that remaineth in Jerusalem, shall be called holy, even everyone that is written among the living in Jerusalem.
Those verses became the Book of Mormon’s 2 Nephi chapter 14:1-3:
And in that day, seven women shall take hold of one man, saying: We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel; only let us be called by thy name to take away our reproach. In that day shall the branch of the Lord be beautiful and glorious; the fruit of the earth excellent and comely to them that are escaped of Israel. And it shall come to pass, they that are left in Zion and remain in Jerusalem shall be called holy, every one that is written among the living in Jerusalem.
Mosiah 14 is pilfered from Isaiah 53:3. Nephi 13:1-23 copies Matthew 6:1-23.
Prolific plagiarism proves Salt Lake City’s “holy book’ not from God.
Point 2: The King James Version, was translated in 1611 into “Early Modern English,” spoken from 1500-1700. When the Book of Mormon was published in 1830, today’s English was spoken. Many exposes of Smith were published shortly after in Modern English, and are easily understood by 21st century readers. Language changes with time. The KJV’s “Shakespeare-sounding” text is not in a “Holy” dialect; but the form of English used when it was translated. Modern versions, such as the New King James Version of 1970, are easily understood Why is the Book of Mormon not only filled with KJV verses, but the rest in words mimicking a dialect not spoken in almost 130 years? Jude 3, written before AD 100 says the Christian faith was “once for all delivered to the saints.” But if Smith had revelations, they would have been in the language of the 1800s, a dead giveaway the Book of Mormon is fake.
Third, Mormons claim Smith did not write the Book of Mormon; it was revealed to him. The 2022 LDS FAIR website says, “Critics claim…major portions of [the Book of Mormon] are copied, without attribution, from the Bible. They present this as evidence…Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon …” (The site then argues the book’s message was revealed to Smith). The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints reprinted and now sells the original 1830 edition. Its title page says, “By Joseph Smith, Junior, Author and Proprietor.”
Many are duped by a cult which vigorously denies Smith’s authorship and boldly confesses it; contradicting claims are completely confusing at best. Yet, Mormons render rigorous research unnecessary to determine the Book’s source. Smith said he wrote it!
Conclusion
Paul by inspiration asked rhetorically in 2 Corinthians 1:17, “Do I purpose according to the flesh, that with me there should be yes, yes and no, no at the same time?” Christians answer “of course not.” The Bible doesn’t say in one place it was divinely revealed while in another it was written by mere humans. Smith’s holy book, however does. The message of real scripture is consistent. I Corinthians 14:33 says, “God is not a God of confusion.”
Note: Article may be reprinted, completely or in part, in its original, unedited form, and only with the author receiving credit.